Focus booster installer.exe
![focus booster installer.exe focus booster installer.exe](https://windows-cdn.softpedia.com/screenshots/Start-Up_2.png)
EXE Setups may bundle and install dependencies such as MSVC++ Redists or Microsoft ODBC Driver that winget is unaware have been installed (dependency resolution is not possible and neither is keeping track of the patch levels of libraries or dependencies)
Focus booster installer.exe .exe#
EXE Setup installs per-user or per-machine It is unclear to the user of winget whether an.Even with silent arguments, some installers do not run/work when there is no user logged in or no graphical user session available (which breaks remote winget installs via ssh/WinRM when nobody is physically logged in to the machine).Even with silent arguments, an installer may show a MessageBox on Error.With silent arguments, some installers may choose undesirable defaults.Even with silent arguments, some installers invoke hidden windows that steal focus.There are no guarantees in install behavior and they all vary a lot:.They complicate the manifest format a lot with varying silent arguments and/or answer files.
![focus booster installer.exe focus booster installer.exe](https://img.informer.com/p4/driver-booster-v5.3-action-center.png)
EXE Setups are often not "transactional" packages, aka changes they make are not reverted on uninstall Let us build the right thing now for the future, instead of reinventing the past we're tring to get away from so desperately What is wrong with supprting. Selection of glorified one-way install-scripts. I want to see how many others would preferĪ tiny starting software selection of REAL packages with all the goodies over a larger software Microsoft has MSIX, it's open-source,Īnd they have winget, it's open-source. This proposal is the formal version of replying "so what?" to this. Is not far enough along yet and it would significantly reduce the amount of available apps. Specifically continuing on this comment by replied there that the adoption of MSIX This is intended to be an open discussion about #223, Instead I propose a (more or less - see below) strict MSIX-only approach. This is a suggestion / spec / discussion on how I believe Description of the new feature/enhancement